The relationship between Charles III and Harry and Meghan's children is once again at the center of media attention. Despite attempts to keep an institutional distance, the monarch's decisions regarding his grandchildren Archie and Lilibet have caused a new chapter of tension.
The underlying issue is clear: Charles III wouldn't consider any kind of formal recognition for young Archie and Lilibet. This stance, far from being just a symbolic gesture, is starting to translate into concrete decisions that affect their bond with the royal family.
U-turn for Archie and Lilibet, Prince Harry's children
According to several media outlets, the issuance of British passports for Archie and Lilibet is reportedly being delayed, supposedly at the monarch's own request. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex believe this decision directly affects their children's identity.
Archie was born in the United Kingdom, but his sister Lilibet was born in the United States and has never set foot on British soil. The lack of documentation makes any approach to their father's country of origin difficult and reinforces the idea of a complete separation from the monarchy.
For many, this attitude from Charles III reflects a strategy: to limit the public and symbolic projection of Harry and Meghan's descendants. Since then, the palace has sought to draw boundaries and reduce the number of active members representing the institution.
Especially regarding those who live outside the country and have resigned from their duties. One of the alternatives considered in the Sussexes' circle is for the children to adopt the surname Spencer, in tribute to their paternal grandmother, the late Diana.
Charles III and Prince Harry are on everyone's lips
This decision would mean a complete break with the traditional structure of royal titles. At the same time, it would be a way to preserve part of their family legacy without depending on the king's decisions.
The case of Archie and Lilibet highlights the new rules Charles III intends to impose within an institution in transformation. The refusal to recognize the children as active members of the royal family marks a turning point.
It makes clear that in this new stage, there's no room for symbolic ties unless they're accompanied by institutional commitment. The king seeks to draw a clear line between those who actively represent the monarchy and those who've chosen to break away.